| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatu.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
07/12/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/12/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
PINTO, R. C.; PINHEIRO, C.; VIDAL, E.; SCHWARTZ, G. |
|
Afiliação: |
RODRIGO COSTA PINTO, USP/ESALQ; CÉSAR PINHEIRO, Tropical Forest Institute; EDSON VIDAL, USP/ESALQ; GUSTAVO SCHWARTZ, CPATU. |
|
Título: |
Technical and financial evaluation of enrichment planting in logging gaps with the high-value species Swietenia macrophylla and Handroanthus serratifolius in the Eastern Amazon. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Forest Ecology and Management, v. 495, Article 119380, 2021. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119380 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Enrichment planting in logging gaps is an important silvicultural treatment to ensure long-term wood production in tropical forests. Knowledge on environmental and economic aspects of enrichment planting with high commercial value timber species in logging gaps is scarce, which creates uncertainty for decision makers about the method effectiveness. To contribute to the debate, this work aimed to evaluate technically and financially enrichment planting of Swietenia macrophylla and Handroanthus serratifolius in logging gaps to serve as a model in the recovery and production increase of these species in future cutting cycles. An experiment on enrichment planting was established in 46 logging gaps in 2009 and measurements of planted individuals were done in 2011, 2014, and 2017. A cost-benefit analysis using net present value (NPV) and a sensitivity analysis were carried out on different interest rates for the production of roundwood and sawnwood. Eight years after planting, individuals of Swietenia and Handroanthus presented a diameter at breast height of 7.88 ± 1.41 cm and 5.20 ± 1.00 cm, and a Periodic Annual Increment (PAI) of 0.98 ± 0.38 cm year�� 1 and 0.65 ± 0.22 cm year�� 1, respectively. At the last measurement, Swietenia and Handroanthus individuals had a survival percentage of 51% and 24% and a mortality rate of 8% and 16% year�� 1, respectively. NPV was positive for Swietenia in roundwood and sawnwood harvested at 60 and 90 years after planting (2nd and 3rd cutting cycles) and for Handroanthus in sawnwood harvested 90 years after planting. Once increasing PAI in 10% and 20%, Swietenia presented the highest NPVs and Handroanthus was profitable with harvest in 60 years and PAI increasing 20%. Based on these results, a model of Swietenia and Handroanthus production and conservation through enrichment planting in logging gaps was built. MenosEnrichment planting in logging gaps is an important silvicultural treatment to ensure long-term wood production in tropical forests. Knowledge on environmental and economic aspects of enrichment planting with high commercial value timber species in logging gaps is scarce, which creates uncertainty for decision makers about the method effectiveness. To contribute to the debate, this work aimed to evaluate technically and financially enrichment planting of Swietenia macrophylla and Handroanthus serratifolius in logging gaps to serve as a model in the recovery and production increase of these species in future cutting cycles. An experiment on enrichment planting was established in 46 logging gaps in 2009 and measurements of planted individuals were done in 2011, 2014, and 2017. A cost-benefit analysis using net present value (NPV) and a sensitivity analysis were carried out on different interest rates for the production of roundwood and sawnwood. Eight years after planting, individuals of Swietenia and Handroanthus presented a diameter at breast height of 7.88 ± 1.41 cm and 5.20 ± 1.00 cm, and a Periodic Annual Increment (PAI) of 0.98 ± 0.38 cm year�� 1 and 0.65 ± 0.22 cm year�� 1, respectively. At the last measurement, Swietenia and Handroanthus individuals had a survival percentage of 51% and 24% and a mortality rate of 8% and 16% year�� 1, respectively. NPV was positive for Swietenia in roundwood and sawnwood harvested at 60 and 90 y... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Análise de Custo-Benefício; Madeira. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Canopy gaps; Forest management. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02682naa a2200217 a 4500
001 2137196
005 2021-12-09
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119380$2DOI
100 1 $aPINTO, R. C.
245 $aTechnical and financial evaluation of enrichment planting in logging gaps with the high-value species Swietenia macrophylla and Handroanthus serratifolius in the Eastern Amazon.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
520 $aEnrichment planting in logging gaps is an important silvicultural treatment to ensure long-term wood production in tropical forests. Knowledge on environmental and economic aspects of enrichment planting with high commercial value timber species in logging gaps is scarce, which creates uncertainty for decision makers about the method effectiveness. To contribute to the debate, this work aimed to evaluate technically and financially enrichment planting of Swietenia macrophylla and Handroanthus serratifolius in logging gaps to serve as a model in the recovery and production increase of these species in future cutting cycles. An experiment on enrichment planting was established in 46 logging gaps in 2009 and measurements of planted individuals were done in 2011, 2014, and 2017. A cost-benefit analysis using net present value (NPV) and a sensitivity analysis were carried out on different interest rates for the production of roundwood and sawnwood. Eight years after planting, individuals of Swietenia and Handroanthus presented a diameter at breast height of 7.88 ± 1.41 cm and 5.20 ± 1.00 cm, and a Periodic Annual Increment (PAI) of 0.98 ± 0.38 cm year�� 1 and 0.65 ± 0.22 cm year�� 1, respectively. At the last measurement, Swietenia and Handroanthus individuals had a survival percentage of 51% and 24% and a mortality rate of 8% and 16% year�� 1, respectively. NPV was positive for Swietenia in roundwood and sawnwood harvested at 60 and 90 years after planting (2nd and 3rd cutting cycles) and for Handroanthus in sawnwood harvested 90 years after planting. Once increasing PAI in 10% and 20%, Swietenia presented the highest NPVs and Handroanthus was profitable with harvest in 60 years and PAI increasing 20%. Based on these results, a model of Swietenia and Handroanthus production and conservation through enrichment planting in logging gaps was built.
650 $aCanopy gaps
650 $aForest management
650 $aAnálise de Custo-Benefício
650 $aMadeira
700 1 $aPINHEIRO, C.
700 1 $aVIDAL, E.
700 1 $aSCHWARTZ, G.
773 $tForest Ecology and Management$gv. 495, Article 119380, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Catálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Trigo. |
|
Identificador: |
69 |
|
Data corrente: |
09/05/2002 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/04/2015 |
|
Código do título: |
0900016 |
|
ISSN: |
0301-2123 |
|
Código CCN: |
000690-4 |
|
Título e Subtítulo: |
ACTA BIOLOGICA PARANAENSE |
|
Entidade: |
Instituto de Biologia da Universidade Federal do Parana |
|
Local de publicação: |
Curitiba, PR |
|
Periodicidade: |
Irregural |
|
Inicio de publicação: |
1972 |
|
Coleções da unidade: |
Embrapa Florestas
1972 1(1/2,3/4); 1975 4(1/2,3/4); 1976 5(3/4); 1983 12(1/4); 1985 14(1/4); 1986 15(1/4); 1987 16(1/4); 1988 17(1/4); 1989 18(1/4); 1990 19(1/4); 1991 20(1/4); 1992 21(1/4); 1994 23(1/4); 1995 24(1/4); 1996 25(1/4); 1997 26(1/4); 1998 27(1/4); 1999 28(1/4); 2000 29(1/4); 2001 30(1/4); 2002 31(1/4); 2003 32(1/4); 2004 33(1/4); 2005 34(1/4); 2006 35(1/2,3/4); 2007 36(1/2,3/4); 2008 37(1/2,3/4); 2009 38(1/2,3/4); 2010 39(1/2,3/4); 2011 40(1/2,3/4); 2012 41(1/2,3/4)
Embrapa Meio Ambiente
1972/2012 1(1/2); 4 (1/2,3/4); 5(1/2,3/4); 6(1/4); 8; 7(1/4); 8(1/4); 9(1/4); 10(1/4); 11(1/4); 12(1/4); 13(1/4); 14(1/4); 15(1/4); 16(1/4); 17(1/4); 18(1/4); 19(1/4); 20(1/4); 21(1/4); 22(1/4); 23(1/4); 24(1/4); 25(1/4); 26(1/4); 27(1/4); 28(1/4); 29(1/4); 30(1/4); 31(1/4); 32(1/4); 33(1/4); 34(1/4); 35(1/2, 3/4); 36(1/4); 37(1/4); 38(1/4); 39(1/4); 40(1/4); 41(1/4)
Embrapa Meio-Norte
1972 1(1/2); 1985-2008 14-38; 2011 40(1-4); 2012 41(1/4)
Classificação: 574.05
Embrapa Trigo
1972/91 1 1972; 2 1973; 3 1974; 4 1975; 5 1976; 6 1977; 7 1978; 8 1979; 9 1980; 10 1981; 11 1982; 12 1983; 13 1984; 14 1985; 15 1986; 16 1987; 18 1989; 19 1990; 20 1991; 28(1-4) 1999.
Classificação: 574.05 |
|
Fechar
|
|
|
